But I spent/spend a lot of time getting it to where it is now. I chose to build one because I felt like it would benefit me to do so as quickly as possible. it's in the game now and you can learn to live with or without one. If they want an Arc, they go after the goods and prints and build one. We have all sorts of players in our guild and they all seem to be doing just fine playing the game their own way. I don't see why this argument keeps coming up. I have a level 75 Arc, which I built in IA over a year ago. I have 4.725 million ranking points in HMA. If it is ranking points, imagine where all of my secondary cities will be by the time I age them into CA!!! So, how it is that we are measuring success? Inquiring minds would like to know. Pointing this out as it was my lowest ranking point total in cities with an Arc) It has always struggled.(And I actually have 430K ranking points. R (us17)- EMA, Current Neighborhood Rank- #1, Level 10 ArcĪ (us1)- HMA, Current Neighborhood Rank- #2, Level 15 ArcĬ (us3)- EMA- Current Neighborhood Rank- #4, Level 8 Arc- stopped playing daily here about a month ago, I think I will transition it to a diamond farm. X (us23)- HMA,Current Neighborhood Rank- #9, just got my Arc after being on a waiting list for months. Will be ranked #2 in the hood before we swap Monday. Hopefully will hit 60 by the end of the month, but we shall see. Q (us16)- Current Neighborhood Rank- #3 My main, in CE, Arc is almost to level 50. BPs for additional levels are hard to come by Y (us24)- EMA, Current Neighborhood Rank- #1, Level 10 Arc. **Note that the DB says last updated 4/14 so all of these are a little out of date** Are we considering 400,000 points exceptionally good for CA or something? Because 5 of my 6 lower aged cities have that beat, and at an earlier age.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |